NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon RX 560X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 560X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6164 versus 3553
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35427 versus 16380
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8824 versus 5698
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8824 versus 5698
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 3 April 2018 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6164 versus 3553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35427 versus 16380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 versus 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 versus 5698 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1175 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1275 MHz versus 1245 MHz
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 69.72 GTexel/s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 896
- 3.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 versus 327
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 versus 3707
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 versus 3707
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1175 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1275 MHz versus 1245 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 69.72 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 896 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 versus 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6164 | 3553 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 669 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35427 | 16380 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2953 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 560X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Polaris 21 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 3 April 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 458 | 385 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
| Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
