NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

versus

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1050 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 275 Watt
Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10147 versus 10015
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 versus 155.307
Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 8673
Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 8673

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 Nov 2019 versus 24 June 2015
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1050 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	138.0 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
Processus de fabrication	12 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 275 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	10147 versus 10015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.926 versus 155.307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569 versus 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569 versus 8673

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

3.2x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 1280
Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 843 versus 753
Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 1940.024
Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.49 versus 11.167
Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 102.69
Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 versus 802.026
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3715
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3715
Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 versus 4669

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	4096 versus 1280
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	843 versus 753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3431.249 versus 1940.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.49 versus 11.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	153.089 versus 102.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	857.575 versus 802.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8925 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 versus 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8925 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 versus 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5170 versus 4669

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10147

10015

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

753

843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

178.926

155.307

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1940.024

3431.249

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.167

12.49

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

102.69

153.089

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

802.026

857.575

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3361

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4669

5170

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark	10147	10015
PassMark - G2D Mark	753	843
Geekbench - OpenCL	55409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.926	155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1940.024	3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.167	12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	102.69	153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	802.026	857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4669	5170

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Essentiel
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	TU116	Fiji
Date de sortie	22 Nov 2019	24 June 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	269	218
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$649
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	4096
Pixel fill rate	55.20 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	138.0 GTexel/s	268.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	275 Watt
Compte de transistor	6600 million	8,900 million
Unités de Compute		64
Performance á point flottant		8,602 gflops
Stream Processors		4096
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity		6
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	9 inches (229 mm)	191 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin	2x 8-pin
Largeur	Dual-slot
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192 GB/s	512 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	4096 Bit
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM)
Vitesse de mémoire		1050 MHz
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)