NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1202 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 versus 42289
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 versus 152.325
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 versus 1590.392
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 versus 45.977
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 versus 751.626
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 6 February 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1202 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 versus 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 versus 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 versus 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 versus 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 versus 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1280
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11654 versus 10145
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 versus 753
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 versus 11.167
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 versus 13569
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 versus 13569
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4904 versus 4669
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1792 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11654 versus 10145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 versus 753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 versus 11.167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 versus 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 versus 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 versus 4669 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10145 | 11654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 | 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 | 4904 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 269 | 275 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | |
Prix maintenant | $799.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |