NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 438.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 versus 406
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 versus 73.167
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 21 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 versus 406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 versus 73.167 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- 4x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1280
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 versus 10147
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 180318 versus 55409
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 178.926
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 1940.024
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 11.167
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 versus 802.026
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 versus 13569
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 versus 13569
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 1280 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 versus 10147 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180318 versus 55409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 178.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 1940.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 11.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 versus 802.026 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 versus 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 versus 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10147 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 | 180318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 500.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 7209.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 41.826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 21 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 269 | 135 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
