NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 77% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 24x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12931 versus 8164
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 765
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61445 versus 53806
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 141.474
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 13.132
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 112.973
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 799.933
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 10141
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 10141
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 26 April 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 versus 8164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 versus 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 versus 2573.643
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3355
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3355
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 2573.643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | 8164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Capsaicin |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $1,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 188 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $849 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 17.05 |
| Conception | reference | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 128 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 277 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 4096 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
IntelArc A530M
