NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 69% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 11.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 versus 9484
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 799
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 155.307
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 12.49
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 857.575
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 8673
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 8673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 versus 9484 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 8673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 2573.643
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 145.886
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3718
- 4.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 versus 1061
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 versus 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 versus 145.886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 versus 1061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 9484 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 221 | 220 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,602 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 268.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 191 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
