NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 69% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 11.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12908 versus 9496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 808 versus 802
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 155.307
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 12.49
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 857.575
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 8673
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 8673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12908 versus 9496 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 808 versus 802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 8673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 2573.643
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 145.886
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3718
- 4.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 versus 1062
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 versus 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 versus 145.886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 versus 1062 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12908 | 9496 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 808 | 802 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61068 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1062 | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 220 | 216 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,602 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 268.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 191 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 740M
