NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 750
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 118.544
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 118.544 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16069 versus 12930
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 61445
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 versus 208.608
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 2573.643
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 16.447
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 versus 926.614
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 16952
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 16952
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 6261
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16069 versus 12930 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 61445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 versus 208.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 versus 16.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 versus 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 6261 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 | 16069 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 226.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 4161.764 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 25.476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 118.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1106.12 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $2,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 154 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
IntelArc A530M
