NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1188 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1243 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11689 versus 7885
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57152 versus 38420
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 versus 115.834
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 versus 10.152
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 versus 105.263
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 versus 597.677
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 10320
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3575
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 10320
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 10 November 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1188 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1243 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11689 versus 7885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 versus 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 versus 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 versus 10.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 versus 105.263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 versus 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 versus 782
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 versus 1892.505
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 versus 782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 versus 1892.505 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11689 | 7885 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 1987.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 10.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 105.263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 10 November 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $799 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 241 | 309 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $539.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 5,700 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,728 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 179.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 7000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |