NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 74% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 210 Watt versus 365 Watt
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 1707 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 versus 30.921
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 versus 1116.126
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 versus 3.799
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 versus 49.114
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 versus 107.239
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 versus 4118
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 versus 4118
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 versus 24 March 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt versus 365 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 1707 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 versus 30.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 versus 1116.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 versus 3.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 versus 49.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 versus 107.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 versus 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 versus 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3330 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Environ 66% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 90% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.7 billion / sec versus 41.0 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 448
- Environ 90% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 1,311.7 gflops
- 2.4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) versus 1280 MB
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 2133
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 2133
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 732 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec versus 41.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 1,311.7 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) versus 1280 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 2133 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | 30.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | 1116.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | 3.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | 49.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | 107.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3330 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12830 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF110 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 | 24 March 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $289 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 766 | 768 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $184 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,311.7 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 365 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | Quad | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1280 MB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 152.0 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz | 1707 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
