NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 versus NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 732 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 41.0 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,311.7 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 210 Watt versus 247 Watt
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 versus 26.973
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 versus 930.623
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 versus 3.142
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 versus 45.924
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 versus 93.747
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 versus 2825
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 versus 2825
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,311.7 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt versus 247 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 versus 26.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 versus 930.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 versus 3.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 versus 45.924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 versus 93.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 versus 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 versus 2825 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- 4.8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 2133
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 2133
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1280 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | 26.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | 930.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | 3.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | 45.924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | 93.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10563 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF110 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $289 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 766 | 767 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,311.7 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 247 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 248 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1280 MB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 152.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
