NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 97% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec
- Environ 9% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 352
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,263.4 gflops versus 855.4 gflops
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 versus 2673
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11015 versus 9276
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 versus 19.079
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 versus 24.513
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3660
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3660
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 versus 31 May 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 352 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops versus 855.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3038 versus 2673 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11015 versus 9276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 versus 19.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 versus 24.513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 versus 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 versus 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 versus 424
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 versus 539.966
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 versus 2.344
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 versus 424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 versus 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 versus 64.308 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3038 | 2673 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11015 | 9276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | 19.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | 741.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | 2.516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | 24.513 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | 64.492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF114 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 | 31 May 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $279 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 822 | 825 |
| Prix maintenant | $138 | $263.28 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | 12.73 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 352 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
| Performance de Compute | 30x | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 352 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.3 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 465
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
