NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.92 GTexel / s versus 34.0 billion / sec
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 448
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,405 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 versus 27.93
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 3.268
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 versus 97.852
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 3873
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3614
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3317
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 3873
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3614
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3317
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 December 2010 versus 26 March 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.92 GTexel / s versus 34.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 versus 27.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 3.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 versus 97.852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3317 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Environ 66% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 versus 708.853
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 versus 36.208
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 732 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 219 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 versus 708.853 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 versus 36.208 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 | 27.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 708.853 | 980.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 | 3.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 | 47.309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 | 97.852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3317 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3134 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11089 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF110 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 7 December 2010 | 26 March 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 789 | 790 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $522.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.92 GTexel / s | 34.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 448 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1280 MB | 1280 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 152.0 GB / s | 133.9 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

