NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M versus AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and AMD Radeon HD 6620G pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 575 MHz versus 400 MHz
- 5.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 versus 341
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 versus 103
- 5.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 versus 962
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 versus 341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 versus 103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 versus 962 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- Environ 19% de pipelines plus haut: 400 versus 336
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 32 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 790 versus 296
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 versus 475
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 versus 657
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 790 versus 296
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 versus 475
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 versus 657
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 400 versus 336 |
| Processus de fabrication | 32 nm versus 40 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 790 versus 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 versus 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 versus 657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 790 versus 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 versus 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 versus 657 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | AMD Radeon HD 6620G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 | 341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | 962 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | 790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | 1755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | 3310 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | 790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | 1755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 | 3310 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | Llano |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2011 | 15 June 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1348 | 1349 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 336 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 336 | 400 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1000 Million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1536 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6620G
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
AMDFirePro V3900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE
