NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 32.2 billion / sec versus 13.0 billion / sec
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 336 versus 96
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 772.8 gflops versus 311.04 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 versus 771
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 versus 227
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 versus 2617
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 6.139
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 versus 171.053
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 versus 0.65
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 versus 9.729
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 versus 19.871
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2011 versus 1 February 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec versus 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 336 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops versus 311.04 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 versus 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 versus 227 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 versus 2617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 versus 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 versus 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 versus 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 versus 19.871 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) versus 1500 MHz
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1208 versus 296
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 versus 475
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 versus 657
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1208 versus 296
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 versus 475
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 versus 657
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) versus 1500 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 versus 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 versus 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 versus 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 versus 657 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 | 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 227 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | 2617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 | 3275 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF114 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1349 | 1351 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $69.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 336 | 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 585 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1536 MB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Mémoire config standard par GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |