NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 13.0 billion / sec
- 3.5x more pipelines: 336 vs 96
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 767
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 230
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 2621
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 6.139
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 171.053
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.65
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 9.729
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 19.871
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2011 vs 1 February 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 336 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 vs 767 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 vs 2621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 vs 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 vs 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 vs 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 vs 19.871 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 1500 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1208 vs 296
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 475
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 657
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1208 vs 296
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 475
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 657
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 | 767 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | 2621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 | 3275 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | GF108 |
Launch date | 28 June 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1349 | 1351 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 1620 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 585 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |