NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost versus ATI FirePro V7800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and ATI FirePro V7800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 134 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 2028
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 307
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 versus 4894
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 versus 15.084
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.448
- 54.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 versus 63
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 versus 26 April 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 2028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 307 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 versus 4894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 versus 15.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 versus 1.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 versus 63 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI FirePro V7800
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 1440 versus 768
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,585 gflops
- 666.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 versus 561.43
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 versus 30.868
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 versus 51.009
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 versus 3426
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1440 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,585 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 versus 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 versus 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 versus 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 versus 3426 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 | 2028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 307 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 | 4894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 15.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 1124.892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 1.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 39.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 181.538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI FirePro V7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 | 26 April 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $759 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 810 | 997 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1440 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 2,154 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 254 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
