NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 25.1 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 35% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 66% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 106 Watt
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 1322
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 310
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 302.509
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.965
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 14.925
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 2160
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 3365
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 2160
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 3365
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 310 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 versus 14.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- 360.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 versus 4493
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 versus 12.582
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.656 versus 23.499
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 versus 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 versus 23.499 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1003 | 1130 |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | $64.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,170 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 6-pin |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |