NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 106 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1322
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 310
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 302.509
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.965
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 14.925
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2160
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3365
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2160
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3365
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 13 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 310 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 vs 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 vs 14.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 360.8x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 vs 4493
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 12.582
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.656 vs 23.499
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 vs 23.499 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK106 | GF106 |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1003 | 1130 |
Price now | $144.81 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 1566 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | 192 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,170 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |