NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 28.8 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 81% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 116 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1751 versus 1554
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 354.392
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 1.125
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 2488
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 3351
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 2488
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 3351
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 322
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 15 March 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 28.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 versus 1554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 1.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Environ 70% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- 205.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1026 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 versus 362
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5772 versus 4481
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 versus 12.582
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 versus 18.386
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 versus 23.499
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 versus 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5772 versus 4481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 versus 23.499 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 | 1554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4481 | 5772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 15 March 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1044 | 1046 |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | $287.59 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | 7.49 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 116 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,170 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | One 6-pin |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 1026 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |