NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GRID K160Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GRID K160Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 850 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 326.4 gflops
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 130 Watt
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 versus 628
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 262
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1237
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1871
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 2654
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1237
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1871
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 2654
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 28 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 326.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 versus 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 2654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 2654 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K160Q
- 356.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1782 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K160Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GRID K160Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 262 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 2654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 2654 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GRID K160Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $125 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1043 | 1044 |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 850 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |