NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 68 GTexel / s
- Environ 5% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 1280
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 2,176 gflops
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5331 versus 3529
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 versus 506
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 5094
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3339
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 5094
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3339
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 2,176 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5331 versus 3529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 versus 506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 versus 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 versus 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3339 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- Environ 70% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22410 versus 15413
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.181 versus 41.613
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1121.002 versus 971.208
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 versus 4.281
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 versus 40.404
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 versus 86.208
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22410 versus 15413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 versus 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1121.002 versus 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 versus 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 versus 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 versus 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 versus 3686 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5331 | 3529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 506 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15413 | 22410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | 51.181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | 1121.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | 5.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | 81.527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | 256.99 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1814 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Wimbledon |
| Date de sortie | 10 May 2012 | 24 April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 566 | 590 |
| Prix maintenant | $474.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6610 XL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
ATIRadeon E2400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
AMDFirePro D700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
