NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1188 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 90 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 versus 561
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 versus 49.824
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 versus 103.884
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 August 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 versus 561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 versus 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 versus 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 49.2 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- Environ 83% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 1,825 gflops
- 1168.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5926 versus 5343
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17999 versus 16715
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 758.865
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 4.279
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.06 versus 29.738
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 6803
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 6803
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2153 versus 1863
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 49.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 1,825 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5926 versus 5343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17999 versus 16715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 758.865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 4.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 versus 29.738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 6803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 6803 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2153 versus 1863 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5343 | 5926 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 | 561 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16715 | 17999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | 1089.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | 4.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | 44.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1863 | 2153 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM206 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 20 August 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 534 |
Prix maintenant | $194.44 | $449.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.06 | 15.45 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz | 1046 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | 1536 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,825 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.2 billion / sec | 134 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 3,540 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 105.6 GB / s | 224.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.6 GB/s | 7012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |