NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition versus AMD FirePro W600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and AMD FirePro W600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 750 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 24 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- 3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 768.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.184 versus 17.708
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 versus 585.463
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 versus 1.857
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 versus 36.592
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 126.579 versus 93.116
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 versus 2331
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 versus 1555
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 versus 3250
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 versus 13 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 750 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 768.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 versus 17.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 versus 585.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 versus 1.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 versus 36.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 versus 93.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 versus 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 versus 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 versus 3250 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W600
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 19.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2331 versus 117
- 14.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1555 versus 108.2
- 27.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3250 versus 119.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2331 versus 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1555 versus 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3250 versus 119.7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | AMD FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | 17.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | 585.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | 1.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | 36.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 | 93.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 | 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 | 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 | 3250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 117 | 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 108.2 | 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 119.7 | 3250 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1671 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6185 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | AMD FirePro W600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 | 13 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 916 | 917 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 163 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1270 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
