NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M versus AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and AMD Radeon HD 8870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 797 MHz versus 725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3808 versus 1638
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12778 versus 8804
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 24.097
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 versus 465.496
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 2.211
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 versus 1638 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12778 versus 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 versus 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 2.211 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 versus 422
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 versus 13.832
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.848 versus 78.867
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 versus 3679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 versus 3679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 versus 422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.848 versus 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12778 | 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 38.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | 106.848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Venus |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 725 | 726 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750
