NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 98.69 GTexel / s
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 2,369 gflops
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 versus 3191
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 11427
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 versus 5.972
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 versus 355.305
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 1.022
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 versus 15.706
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 versus 34.772
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 2,369 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 versus 3191 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 11427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 versus 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 versus 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 versus 15.706 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 versus 34.772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3715 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 versus 333
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 versus 4501
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 versus 4501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 versus 333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | 3191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 11427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 15.706 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 34.772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 6747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 6747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3362 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 774 | 775 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
