NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 72 billion / sec versus 55.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 37% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,413 gflops versus 1,761 gflops
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6100 versus 3870
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 565
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 versus 47.041
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 versus 4.41
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 versus 6173
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 versus 6173
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec versus 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops versus 1,761 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6100 versus 3870 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 versus 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 versus 4.41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 versus 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 versus 6173 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- 171.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1200 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 versus 792.44
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 35.338
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 versus 200.825
- 8.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1312 versus 157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 versus 792.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 35.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 versus 157 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6100 | 3870 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 565 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18663 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 157 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM206 | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 | 5 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $249 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 524 | 526 |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | $449.59 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.63 | 11.01 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 210 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 2x | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
ATIRadeon X1300 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
