NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A versus AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 4.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 versus 589
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.67 versus 1.767
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 3716
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 3358
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 3716
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 3358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 versus 589 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 versus 1.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
- Environ 84% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 80 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 640
- Environ 84% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,560 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4637 versus 2411
- 6.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 versus 12495
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.001 versus 49.772
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 952.668 versus 757.295
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.456 versus 49.875
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 294.215 versus 179.567
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6821 versus 5157
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6821 versus 5157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,560 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4637 versus 2411 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77430 versus 12495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.001 versus 49.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 952.668 versus 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.456 versus 49.875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 294.215 versus 179.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 versus 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6821 versus 5157 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2411 | 4637 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 | 589 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | 77430 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | 55.001 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | 952.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | 1.767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | 64.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | 294.215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1651 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 5 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 475 | 477 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 2,560 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 80 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon HD 8760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
