NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 416.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 versus 30.505
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 versus 705.293
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 versus 3.085
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 versus 35.416
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 versus 62.69
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3690
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3690
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 6 September 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 versus 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 versus 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 versus 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 versus 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 versus 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 640
- Environ 32% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 1,505 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4000 versus 3374
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 versus 245
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11374 versus 10982
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 1231
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 1,505 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4000 versus 3374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 versus 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11374 versus 10982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 1231 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 | 4000 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10982 | 11374 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 6 September 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 772 | 774 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 980 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 47.04 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 140 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |