NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1216 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 144 billion / sec versus 128.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,981 gflops versus 4,096 gflops
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 165 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11113 versus 6150
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 676
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 110.006 versus 89.187
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.194 versus 7.656
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 versus 8 October 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 144 billion / sec versus 128.0 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops versus 4,096 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11113 versus 6150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 versus 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 versus 7.656 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 versus 1348.307
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 versus 37.443
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 477.015
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3335
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3335
- 4.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2351 versus 475
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 versus 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 versus 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 versus 475 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11113 | 6150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 | 2351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM204 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 379 | 380 |
Prix maintenant | $605.06 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 144 billion / sec | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |