NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M versus AMD FirePro W7100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD FirePro W7100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1038 MHz versus 920 MHz
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 400 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7356 versus 5251
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 versus 65.781
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.776 versus 5.854
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 versus 6362
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 versus 6362
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 12 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1038 MHz versus 920 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 400 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7356 versus 5251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 versus 65.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 versus 5.854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 versus 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 versus 6362 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7100
- Environ 99% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 103.0 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1536
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,297 gflops versus 1,659 gflops
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 versus 491
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 24871 versus 23790
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1248.285 versus 1146.534
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 versus 18.431
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 versus 308.42
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 103.0 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,297 gflops versus 1,659 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 versus 491 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24871 versus 23790 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 versus 1146.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 versus 18.431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 versus 308.42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3342 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7356 | 5251 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 | 661 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23790 | 24871 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | 65.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | 1248.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | 5.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | 94.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | 361.58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3190 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD FirePro W7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Tonga |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 12 August 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 452 | 449 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1127 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1038 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,659 gflops | 3,297 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | 103.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 530v
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDRadeon R9 270X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AppleM2 Pro 16-core
