NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M versus AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon R9 270X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1127 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7347 versus 4890
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 versus 63.455
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.776 versus 6.339
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 versus 8068
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 versus 8068
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2942 versus 1771
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1127 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7347 versus 4890 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 versus 63.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 versus 6.339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 versus 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 versus 8068 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 versus 1771 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Environ 62% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 84 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
- Environ 62% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,688 gflops versus 1,659 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 611 versus 498
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.545 versus 1146.534
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 versus 18.431
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.366 versus 308.42
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,688 gflops versus 1,659 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 611 versus 498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 versus 1146.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 versus 18.431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.366 versus 308.42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3342 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7347 | 4890 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21534 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | 63.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | 1314.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | 6.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | 85.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | 315.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 | 1771 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Curacao |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 448 | 439 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $399 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1127 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1038 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,659 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIFireGL V3400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIFirePro 2460 Multi-View
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
