NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M versus AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon R9 280 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

versus

AMD Radeon R9 280

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1127 MHz versus 933 MHz
2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 200 Watt
2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1250 MHz
Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7350 versus 5563
Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 versus 67.829
Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.776 versus 6.495
Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 versus 7957
Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 versus 7957
Environ 46% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2942 versus 2009

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	7 October 2014 versus 4 March 2014
Vitesse augmenté	1127 MHz versus 933 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 200 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 3 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	2500 MHz versus 1250 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	7350 versus 5563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	92.634 versus 67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.776 versus 6.495
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10572 versus 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3342 versus 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10572 versus 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3342 versus 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2942 versus 2009

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280

times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 104.5 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1536
2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,344 gflops versus 1,659 gflops
Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 versus 498
Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.685 versus 1146.534
4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.909 versus 18.431
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 365.384 versus 308.42

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	104.5 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 versus 1536
Performance á point flottant	3,344 gflops versus 1,659 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	665 versus 498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1266.685 versus 1146.534
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	79.909 versus 18.431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	365.384 versus 308.42
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 versus 3695

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7350

5563

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

665

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

92.634

67.829

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1146.534

1266.685

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.776

6.495

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.431

79.909

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

308.42

365.384

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10572

7957

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3342

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10572

7957

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3342

3337

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2942

2009

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	AMD Radeon R9 280
PassMark - G3D Mark	7350	5563
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	665
Geekbench - OpenCL	21586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	92.634	67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1146.534	1266.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.776	6.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.431	79.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	308.42	365.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10572	7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3342	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10572	7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3342	3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2942	2009

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	AMD Radeon R9 280
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Nom de code	GM204	Tahiti
Date de sortie	7 October 2014	4 March 2014
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	450	423
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$279
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1127 MHz	933 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1038 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	1536
Performance á point flottant	1,659 gflops	3,344 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1536	1792
Taux de remplissage de la texture	51.84 GTexel / s	104.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	200 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,200 million	4,313 million
Stream Processors		1792
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)	1
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDMI
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA	1
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	large
Options SLI	1
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Longeur		275 mm
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	3 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	160 GB / s	240 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	384 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	2500 MHz	1250 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0
Technologies
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)