NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M versus AMD Radeon R9 285
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon R9 285 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1038 MHz versus 918 MHz
- Environ 90% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 190 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7352 versus 6680
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 versus 72.799
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.776 versus 6.369
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 versus 6474
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3043
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 versus 2782
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 versus 6474
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3043
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 versus 2782
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2942 versus 2778
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 2 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1038 MHz versus 918 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 190 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7352 versus 6680 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 versus 72.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 versus 6.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 versus 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 versus 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 versus 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 versus 2782 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 versus 2778 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 285
- Environ 98% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 102.8 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1536
- Environ 98% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,290 gflops versus 1,659 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 versus 499
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 versus 1146.534
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 versus 18.431
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 versus 308.42
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.8 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,290 gflops versus 1,659 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 versus 499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 versus 1146.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 versus 18.431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 versus 308.42 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7352 | 6680 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 | 597 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21586 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | 72.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | 1474.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | 6.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | 91.954 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | 391.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 2782 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 | 2778 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon R9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Tonga |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 2 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 449 | 444 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1127 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1038 MHz | 918 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,659 gflops | 3,290 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | 102.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 221 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 176.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIFireGL V3400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIFirePro 2460 Multi-View
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
