NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN versus AMD FirePro S10000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and AMD FirePro S10000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 837 MHz versus 825 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 750 Watt
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8210 versus 4768
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 versus 502
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 versus 7867
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3621
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3321
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 versus 7867
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3621
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3321
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 February 2013 versus 12 November 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8210 versus 4768 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 versus 502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 versus 7867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 versus 7867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S10000
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 950 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 187.5 billion / sec
- Environ 52% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2688
- Environ 45% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 3,405 gflops versus 4,709 gflops
- 833.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 30631 versus 24431
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.836 versus 62.027
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.978 versus 5.835
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 187.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2688 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 3,405 gflops versus 4,709 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30631 versus 24431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 versus 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 versus 5.835 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | AMD FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8210 | 4768 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 | 502 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24431 | 30631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | 73.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | 6.978 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | 7867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | 7867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | AMD FirePro S10000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK110 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 19 February 2013 | 12 November 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $3,599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 438 | 439 |
| Prix maintenant | $2,054.59 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 876 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2688 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,709 gflops | 2x 3,405 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2688 | 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 187.5 billion / sec | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 305 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.4 GB / s | 480 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384-bit GDDR5 | 2x 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDFirePro S10000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAP106-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
IntelArc A550M
