NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon R9 290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

versus

AMD Radeon R9 290X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1038 MHz versus 947 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
25x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 250 Watt
4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	21 February 2019 versus 24 October 2013
Vitesse augmenté	1038 MHz versus 947 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt versus 250 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 versus 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 versus 3353

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290X

7.3x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 384
3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8526 versus 2392
3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 755 versus 240
4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 43410 versus 9329
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 117.322 versus 46.992
4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 versus 535.24
4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.12 versus 2.64
2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 versus 44.7
4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 628.757 versus 141.816
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8729 versus 4027
Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 versus 3710
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8729 versus 4027
Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 versus 3710
4.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3932 versus 888

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	2816 versus 384
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	8526 versus 2392
PassMark - G2D Mark	755 versus 240
Geekbench - OpenCL	43410 versus 9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	117.322 versus 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2460.464 versus 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.12 versus 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.942 versus 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	628.757 versus 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8729 versus 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7055 versus 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8729 versus 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7055 versus 3710
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3932 versus 888

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

8526

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

240

755

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9329

43410

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.992

117.322

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

535.24

2460.464

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.64

11.12

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.7

120.942

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

141.816

628.757

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4027

8729

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

7055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4027

8729

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

7055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

888

3932

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark	2392	8526
PassMark - G2D Mark	240	755
Geekbench - OpenCL	9329	43410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.992	117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	535.24	2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.64	11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.7	120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	141.816	628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4027	8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4027	8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	888	3932

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	AMD Radeon R9 290X
Essentiel
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Nom de code	GP108B	Hawaii
Date de sortie	21 February 2019	24 October 2013
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	861	284
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$549
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1038 MHz	947 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	937 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	2816
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	250 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,800 million	6,200 million
Performance á point flottant		5,632 gflops
Stream Processors		2560
Taux de remplissage de la texture		176.0 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Longeur		275 mm
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	512 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	6008 MHz	1250 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
RAM maximale		4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		320 GB/s
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)