NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 3.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 80x plus de pipelines: 1920 versus 24
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 11.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 1237
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 299
- 15.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 4657
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 27.517
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 354.254
- 12x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 1.807
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 20.323
- 38.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 29.327
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 1870
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 1596
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3309
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 1870
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 1596
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3309
- 18.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 versus 68
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 1 September 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 24 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 versus 68 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 10.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 160 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | TU106 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 161 | 1234 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 189 million |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |