NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Environ 65% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1440 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 versus 536
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1440 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 versus 536 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Environ 28% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2304
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7978 versus 7444
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13147 versus 12354
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 versus 18604
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 versus 18604
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2944 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7978 versus 7444 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 versus 12354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 versus 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 versus 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 8029 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7444 | 7978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 536 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 13147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 8060 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 8060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU106 | TU104B |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 128 | 143 |
| Prix maintenant | $489.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1440 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2944 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
