NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1920
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 versus 14148
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 versus 750
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 versus 70661
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 220.337
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3131.344
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 21.852
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 135.923
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1141.283
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 20094
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 20094
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1920 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 versus 14148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 versus 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 versus 70661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 20094 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 215 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3359
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3359
- 1069.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7488 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7488 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 14148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 70661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 7488 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 150 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |