NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 166.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 12500 million
- Environ 91% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 versus 135.416
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 versus 12.678
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 versus 11925
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3947
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 versus 11925
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3947
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 19 March 2019 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 versus 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 versus 12.678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 versus 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 versus 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3947 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Environ 69% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 67.65 GTexel/s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2048
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 versus 6757
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 versus 403
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53780 versus 50603
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 versus 1980.866
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 versus 745.481
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 8045
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 8045
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 712 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 67.65 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 2048 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 versus 6757 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 versus 403 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53780 versus 50603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 versus 1980.866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 versus 745.481 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 8045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 8045 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6757 | 11300 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 784 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50603 | 53780 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 3063.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 12.678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 883.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 10411 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 10411 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4932 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Vega 10 PRO |
| Nom de code | GA107 | Greenland |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 19 March 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 240 | 237 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 12500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 2048 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
