NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 166.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 12500 million
• Around 91% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 135.416
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 12.678
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 11925
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3947
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 11925
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3947

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• 3.7x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 6757
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 403
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53780 vs 50603
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 1980.866
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 745.481
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 8045
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 8045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6757 11300
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	403 784
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50603 53780
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 135.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980.866 3063.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.641 12.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	745.481 883.876
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 10411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 10411

Compare specifications (specs)