NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.65 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 versus 142.691
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 versus 1729.558
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 versus 12.693
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 versus 111.376
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 versus 13339
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3353
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 versus 13339
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 versus 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 versus 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 versus 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 versus 111.376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 versus 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 versus 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Environ 76% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1250 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1350 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 2048
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1572 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 versus 6755
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 402
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71298 versus 50608
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 745.481
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz versus 712 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2048 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 versus 6755 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 402 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71298 versus 50608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 745.481 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6755 | 12920 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 797 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50608 | 71298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 111.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 1396.172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4932 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | GA107 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 27 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 242 | 241 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1572 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
