NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.65 GTexel/s versus 58.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6831 versus 5029
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 versus 17466
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 versus 67.209
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 versus 799.414
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 versus 4.536
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 versus 30.523
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 versus 223.683
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 versus 7043
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3685
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3360
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 versus 7043
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3685
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3360
- 3.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 421 versus 122
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 25 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s versus 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 640 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 versus 5029 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 versus 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 versus 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 versus 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 versus 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 versus 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 versus 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 versus 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 versus 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 versus 122 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Environ 81% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 versus 403
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 712 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 versus 403 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA107 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 25 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 248 | 586 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | IGP | 2-slot |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |