NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1216 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 144 billion / sec
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 11112
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 791
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 34898
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 110.006
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1348.307
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 9.194
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 37.443
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 477.015
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 9566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3335
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 9566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3335
- 5.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 474
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 19 September 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1216 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 144 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 2048 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 11112 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 34898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 474 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Environ 21% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 165 Watt versus 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 11112 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 34898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 474 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 19 September 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 379 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $605.06 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 144 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 165 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 5,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |