NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 3072
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 versus 337.794
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4619.617 versus 4566.815
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 versus 31.631
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 versus 3716
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 versus 3355
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 versus 3716
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 versus 3355
- 5218.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10437 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 23 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 3072 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 versus 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 versus 4566.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 versus 31.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10437 versus 2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1290 MHz
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19611 versus 15500
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 650
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 117339 versus 89617
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 versus 181.818
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 versus 1410.887
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 24877
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 24877
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1290 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19611 versus 15500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 versus 89617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 versus 181.818 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 versus 1410.887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 24877 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15500 | 19611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89617 | 117339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | 4566.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 1654.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10437 | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 80 | 109 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1290 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 206.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 384.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI |