NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15361 versus 10616
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 643 versus 592
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 versus 61276
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 versus 127.622
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4619.617 versus 3026.812
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 versus 18.798
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 versus 119.936
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1410.887 versus 910.721
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 versus 14076
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 versus 1976
- 7.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 versus 1781
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 versus 14076
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 versus 1976
- 7.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 versus 1781
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 13 September 2018 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15361 versus 10616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 versus 592 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 versus 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 versus 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 versus 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 versus 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 versus 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 versus 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1290 MHz
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 80 Watt
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1290 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 80 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15361 | 10616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | 592 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 | 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2380 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 September 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 81 | 270 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1290 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 206.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 384.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
