NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- 3.1x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 1920
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 14119
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 746
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 71402
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 217.04
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 3119.736
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 21.707
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 133.975
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1141.283
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 20094
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 7442
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 6714
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 20094
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 7442
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 6714
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 1242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 7 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 1920 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 1242 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 220 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 44 | 161 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |