NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 293.508
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.212 versus 29.145
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 158.103
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 25232
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3718
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3359
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 25232
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3718
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 2560 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 versus 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3552.807
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1422.602
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1422.602 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 92 | 133 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13.6 B |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI |