NVIDIA Quadro K1200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 35.97 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 45% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,151 gflops versus 793.3 gflops
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 versus 2135
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 versus 475
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 versus 6108
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 versus 24.117
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 versus 335.835
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 versus 1.651
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 versus 97.126
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 versus 2918
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 versus 2918
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 January 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.97 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,151 gflops versus 793.3 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 versus 2135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 versus 475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 versus 6108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 versus 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 versus 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 versus 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 versus 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 versus 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 versus 2918 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 25.411
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 versus 1721
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3288
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 versus 1721
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3288
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 25.411 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 versus 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 versus 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3288 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 2135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 6108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 28 January 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 798 | 979 |
| Prix maintenant | $289.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,151 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.97 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K1200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K1200 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro K1200 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAQuadro K1200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro K1200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
NVIDIAQuadro K1200 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
NVIDIAQuadro K1200 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
