NVIDIA Quadro K2100M versus ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and ATI Radeon HD 5770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 96% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 108 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1357 versus 1341
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 versus 9.373
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 versus 0.906
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 2673
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 versus 2799
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 2673
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 versus 2799
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 13 October 2009 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 108 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 versus 1341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 versus 9.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 versus 0.906 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 versus 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 2799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 versus 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 2799 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5770
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 667 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
- Environ 39% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 576
- Environ 77% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 3008 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 versus 282
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 versus 4515
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 versus 358.892
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 versus 21.761
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.793 versus 40.703
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 versus 2294
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 versus 2294
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 667 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 versus 576 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 768.4 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 3008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 versus 282 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10495 versus 4515 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 459.025 versus 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.022 versus 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.793 versus 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 versus 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 versus 2294 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 | 1341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 282 | 333 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4515 | 10495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | 9.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | 459.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | 0.906 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | 27.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | 48.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 | 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 2799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 | 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 2799 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 13 October 2009 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $84.95 | $159 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1108 | 1111 |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 667 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 768.4 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 800 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.02 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 108 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Longeur | 208 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity |