NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 68 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4008 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3564 versus 3059
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 546 versus 434
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 versus 10723
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 versus 31.935
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 versus 539.966
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 versus 2.344
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 versus 64.308
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 versus 4184
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 versus 4184
- 3.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 versus 389
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 25 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3564 versus 3059 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 546 versus 434 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 versus 10723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 versus 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 versus 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 versus 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 versus 4184 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 versus 389 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 versus 30.455
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 1577
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 1671
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 1577
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 1671
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 versus 30.455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 1671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3564 | 3059 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 546 | 434 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 10723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 | 389 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 25 January 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $395.75 | $249 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 813 | 815 |
| Prix maintenant | $343.99 | $138 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | 27.88 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 202 mm | 229 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K2200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 770
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAT600
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon 610M (Dragon Range)
